I was not surprised it happened; I was kind of expecting it to happen, something stupid to happen, something obnoxious to happen, somewhere, at a Starbucks or similar establishment across every day USA.
It has been happening almost daily in every day America.
The 'incident' at Philadelphia Starbucks where and when two black"individuals" as Starbucks described them in its first official statement following the arrest of those "individuals". Starbucks in its first reaction to the humiliation of black America at one of its branches did not dare to say what it should have said and it did not dare to describe the two men as it should have described but instead it carefully chose carefully worded description and said individuals rather than and instead of saying customers.
Starbucks refused to say or admit that the two humans who went to buy coffee and wait for a friend to arrive were actually customers and not as their manager in Philadelphia and the police in Philadelphia described them and called them ... "trespassers'.
Two humans, two men, two customers, went to buy coffee at a Starbucks, which by the way sells horrible coffee, they burn their beans; these two individuals got arrested because they asked to use the bathroom before ordering and while waiting for the friend to arrive.
Starbucks like many food establishments across America and elsewhere around the world , but only in cities, or mostly in big cities, lock their toilets and some say only customers allowed to use toilets, which is in some instances reasonable accommodation however in the case of Starbucks as most probably if not all do, once the customer enters and say I will order, locks should become unlocked. But again, Starbucks is not a restaurant, and even if it were a restaurant and in restaurants it happens all the time, customers or diners enter, and tell servers we will not order until their guests arrive, and set at the table and go to toilets reserved only for customers- it is polite anyway if waiting for friends to arrive not to order before friends arrive.
Starbucks failed people on that day in April in Philadelphia and failed it's customers and failed its"individuals" and the reaction from corporate exemplifies the failure of that manager on that day at that local branch in Philadelphia.
It's ok for people and blacks in particular to peacefully boycott Starbucks and boycott will benefit them and all anyway not only to make a statement for that incident in Philadelphia but also for taste reasons as will.
Check related:
Starbucks Humiliates Black America in Philadelphia
Starbucks vs. Black America
It has been happening almost daily in every day America.
The 'incident' at Philadelphia Starbucks where and when two black"individuals" as Starbucks described them in its first official statement following the arrest of those "individuals". Starbucks in its first reaction to the humiliation of black America at one of its branches did not dare to say what it should have said and it did not dare to describe the two men as it should have described but instead it carefully chose carefully worded description and said individuals rather than and instead of saying customers.
Starbucks refused to say or admit that the two humans who went to buy coffee and wait for a friend to arrive were actually customers and not as their manager in Philadelphia and the police in Philadelphia described them and called them ... "trespassers'.
Two humans, two men, two customers, went to buy coffee at a Starbucks, which by the way sells horrible coffee, they burn their beans; these two individuals got arrested because they asked to use the bathroom before ordering and while waiting for the friend to arrive.
Starbucks like many food establishments across America and elsewhere around the world , but only in cities, or mostly in big cities, lock their toilets and some say only customers allowed to use toilets, which is in some instances reasonable accommodation however in the case of Starbucks as most probably if not all do, once the customer enters and say I will order, locks should become unlocked. But again, Starbucks is not a restaurant, and even if it were a restaurant and in restaurants it happens all the time, customers or diners enter, and tell servers we will not order until their guests arrive, and set at the table and go to toilets reserved only for customers- it is polite anyway if waiting for friends to arrive not to order before friends arrive.
Starbucks failed people on that day in April in Philadelphia and failed it's customers and failed its"individuals" and the reaction from corporate exemplifies the failure of that manager on that day at that local branch in Philadelphia.
It's ok for people and blacks in particular to peacefully boycott Starbucks and boycott will benefit them and all anyway not only to make a statement for that incident in Philadelphia but also for taste reasons as will.
Check related:
Starbucks Humiliates Black America in Philadelphia
Starbucks vs. Black America
 |
| A sign in a Starbucks located in downtown Pittsburgh on Saturday, March 24, 2018. (AP Photo/Gene J. Puskar) |
